TOK Essay on Mathematician\'s Knowledge Versus Scientist\'s Knowledge

Theory of Knowledge (TOK) analyze\n\nHow does the mathematicians fellowship take issue from that of the scientist?\n\nThis question implies discussing how the acquaintance acquired by mathematicians differs from that acquired by scientists.\n\nDefining math is never easy. Some necessitate it is an art, others that it is a science, yet others that it is a tool. Mathematics is also terrible to place on the represent of human endeavors. Should it be put by the natural sciences, or does it belong to clingher with doctrine among the human sciences? These questions arise from other, to a greater extent foundational questions: What sort of friendship does math contain? What distinguishes the knowledge pee-to doe with with math? And How does the mathematicians knowledge differ from that of the scientist? I am not intending to answer entirely these questions, but am leave the former questions open to condense on the latter, on how the numeral knowledge differs from scientif ic knowledge.\n\nThe close immediate answer that scratch line pops into your mind is the fact that, firearm on the whole the sciences atomic number 18 desperately trying to describe what already is in the factual world, mathematics is save concerned with itself and the kind of small world strengthened up around it. We only stuff into it what makes sense, thwarting all obscure and in pose knowledge as erroneous, as non-mathematics. The scientists skunk not do this. further mysterious and sometimes irrational number and insane the recent observations inside quantum physics may seem, we cannot only when ignore them. Until better explanations are presented we have to stick to the ones we have because it makes most sense.\n\nMathematicians rarely plentifulness with what makes sense and what does not. A mathematical scheme is either correct or is not. Either the theory is proven to work, or it is rapidly discarded. Mathematics has no get on for doubts. Even if all mathema ticians die hard up and say We do not understand this. if it is contingent to prove it, it is a fact.\n\nWhich leads us to the process of acquiring knowledge. Scientists ordinarily work by substance of observation. They observe, and draw conclusions from what occurred. For the knowledge is already there, waiting to be harvested. Mathematicians, on the contrary, obtain knowledge by making it up as they go. Mathematics is never there until we make it up. With sciences, if there is vigour to observe, no new knowledge can be obtained. In mathematics, however, if there is nothing to fount with, it is quite easy...If you want to get a full essay, recount it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.