Profile prepared by Management Analysis Corporation

Do you accept that the diagnosis and resulting profile prepared by Management compend confederation was a necessary step in the process of finding potentially successful everyday managers? ExplainThe profile prepared by Management Analysis society is the first step in the process of finding a potentially successful of general managers, but it is not the only step. Actually, after(prenominal) MAC has understood very clearly the pick let ons of Dancey Electronics, they could picture the correct leader. Once this was done, they could see what skills must be innate and what skills fundament be learned to become a leader. Then, MAC could propose one more(prenominal) interview to the rear enddidates. For example, the burn downdidates are faced to a concrete leadership problem, and they need to solve it very quickly.MAC should analyze reactions of the candidates and pick the best one. This means pickaxe the person who has the best ability to change and to adapt to a revolut ionary situation. So, I do not know yet if Joe Morris could be the heavy candidate for leading Dancey Electronics.Moreover, I think that the analysis done by MAC is a good way to find a potentially successful group of general managers because it accually describes the ideal qualities of being an utile general manager and at the same time gives us ideas about the kind and task orientation of each candidate along with analysis of or so important environmental factors that might have some effect on their leadership tendency, such as the companys hope and the subordinated expectation for the behavior of general managers.However, I think Management Analysis Corporation should analyze the behavior of the fol scurvylyers more. This way, MAC will know what leadership style would be the best for the group.What alternatives are available to modify Joe Morriss potential effectiveness in the new general manager smirch?Joe Morris has a high task orientation it means he can apply an init iating structure focused on goals and results. still it is not exuberant to lead a team. Joe Morris has to be more kind oriented. We know that Joe Morris has low skills in relationship orientation. But a leader needs to broadcast with his team to have an influence on the behavior of the individuals. If Joe Morris does not change, he could only be a manager, but not a leader. As we learnt in class, leaders do the right things, managers do things right.According to the fielder theory, Joe Morris can make changes to be more relationship-oriented. He can pretermit more informal time (lunch, leisure activities) with his subordinates. He can withal request particular people for work in his group. He can be a volunteer to direct knockout or fleshy subordinates. He can suggest or affects transfers of particular subordinates into his unit. Finally, Joe Morris can uprise morale by obtaining positive outcomes (special bonuses, time off, attractive jobs) for subordinates.Moreover, Jo e Morris should follow a training session to discuss and analyze his leadership situation. This way, he can understand his performance and improve it. If Joe Morris increases his position of power, he could be a better leader because he would repair his lack in relationship orientation.Why will it be difficult for Joe Morris to modify his style of leadership?Joe Morris knows how to create and define the relationships in the group and he establishes well-defined patterns and channels of communication, and spells out ship canal of getting the job done. So it is a good start. But it would be difficult for him to modify his style of leadership because it is very hard to change him. Moreover, he does not have an overall insight of the company. He needs to fit in the group to eventually change. Considering that Joe Morris is far past from a good relationship orientation, it might be very difficult for him to understand what changes he has to do to modify his style of leadership.It also whitethorn be hard for Joe Morris to change his style of leadership due to the reason against the path-goal theory whereby subordinates play a rulein the leadership style of the manager. In that, Joe Morris has a low score in relationship orientation which means that his relationship with the employees may not be as effective and efficient. As a result, although Morris my want to change his leadership style type, employees may not be as willing to change given his low relationship orientation which therefore makes it hard for him to change his leadership style.But on the other hand, according to the Leader-Member Exchange Approach, there is no consistent leader behavior across subordinates and Joe Morris can behave in different ways with his future followers than he used to. So he may not have to change his style of leadership and still be appreciated by his followers. Therefore he will become a good leader.