The No Child Left Behind Act: Impact on the Assessment of Special Educa

The No Child Left arse Act contact on the Assessment of Special Education StudentsThree years by and by the No Child Left lav Act (NCLB) moved into our schools at that place is a great deal of contr everywheresy that questions whether the act implemented by President George W. Bush is helping or hurting an already scurvy school system. There argon many dimensions of the NCLB act that have been questioned over the past three years the fair assessment of students with disabilities is one of them. As the National Center for Fair & Open Testing (NCFOT) reported, the populace dealing aspect of this act is strong. However, all other areas of the new law are falling short of meeting their goals. In an annual report razz developed by the NCFOT in 2005 accountability was rated with a ?D? and high-quality assessments with an ?F?. They further explain that Bush?s act encourages the use of technical testing where they should be using classroom based assessments. Also, the accountabilit y is fair misleading and can cause schools that are moving forward to change shape into test-prep schools (NCFOT, 2005). While this report card focuses on how the NCLB act affects all subgroups in education, it is important to look at one group in point the excess education students. President Bush?s NCLB act is forcing special education students to perform on statewide assessments that are above their intelligence information level and are often requiring them to pass the assessments in order to buzz off a high school diploma. This often causes teachers, such as Lindley Corcoran, a special education teacher at Sheppard Pratt private school for students with monstrous disabilities, to teach to the test rather than teach practical functional skills which she believes pull up stakes be ... ...ting Office. Fair Test. (2005). The National Center for Fair & Open Testing. Retrieved from http//www.fairtest.orgGoldhaber, D. (2002). What capability go wrong with the accountability measures of the ?No Child Left Behind Act The Urban Institute.Improving accountability for limited English beneficial and special education studentsunder the No Child Left Behind Act. (2003). Washington Area School Study Council. No educator left-hand(a) quarter Testing special education students. (2003). Retrieved March 18, 2005, from http//www.education-world.com/a_issues/NELB/NELB025.shtmlOlson, L. (2004). Data order of battle schools making progress on federal goals. Education Week,24, 24-28. Retrieved from http//www.edweek.orgTomes, H. Ph.D. (2004). In public interest Are we really leaving no child behind? American Psychologist, 35, 31-35. Retrieved from www.apa.org